Skip to main content

What so wrong with being “cartoony”?

What kid in the last fifty years doesn’t remember getting up on Saturday morning to watch cartoons over a large bowl of cereal?  Of course, some of those cartoons were super hero cartoons like Spiderman and His Amazing Friends or the Super Friends.  These cartoons were always simple and shallow.  No one questioned the motives of the villains.  They were just villains and always up to no good.  And that was good enough for us.

Back when I started my first real stint collecting comics in the early 1990’s, every comic book generally looked the same.  The books were littered with huge muscled men with shoulder pads larger than what football players wore and females who looked like they stepped right out of a science fiction porno.  And it was accepted and loved.  But it was all the same (and a little ridiculous.  I remember a one-shot parody put out by Grant Morrison mocking the style of these comic books.)

Luckily enough, comic books have diversified since then.  Not all comic book art is the same.  Not all comic book writing is the same.  Rather, comic books have diversified, and this has had a positive effect on the industry.  There is a place for all types of comic books, and by extension, all types of comic book readers. 

image However, old habits are to break.  Since I have started back collecting, I have began reading online comic book reviews, mostly to determine whether certain series which I am interested in are worth reading or not.  One critique that have seem more often or not is that the artwork of a particular book is “cartoony.”  For example, I read a recent review of Darkstar and the Winter Guard in which the reviewer referred to the artwork as being “cartoony,” wielding the term in a derogatory way to describe the art as immature.

The problem with using the term “cartoony” suggests that there is no room in comics for books with this style.  Such critiques suggest that the only artwork worth producing is art which is mature, realistic, and abstract.  I think this is a carry over from the success of books like the Arkham Asylum, the Dark Knight Returns, and the Watchmen.

But who says that all comic books should imitate this style?  I find it amazing that one of the biggest complaints the comic book readers have is that there is not enough new readers. Yet, these same readers eschew comic books which do not fit a certain style. 

There is merit in comic books which are not necessarily dark or require imagecomplex story lines.  Comic books are not just for males between the ages of 18 through 25.  And publishers have discovered this.  I have noticed over the last year that I have been collecting comic books, Marvel has released a number of books which have been geared toward female readers.  One such book called, Marvel Divas, wonderfully recounts the trials of four female super heroines, from cancer to relationship problems, from financial problems to independence from a male centered world. 

There is a place in comic books for the cartoony.  My thought is that cartoony comic books bridge the gap between the youngest of comic book readers, those tots who might read say Tiny Titans, and, adolescents who delve into the gritty, dark, complex books like Batman and Robin.

It is alright for a book like Darkstar and the Winter Guard to be cartoony if such a style properly adds to the over story.  There is nothing complex about this book.  Nothing dark or earth shattering.  It is a simple, straight forward story encapsulating the battle between heroes and villains which requires simple straight forward art with a lot of action and drama.  And that is alright and appropriate for the readers for whom the book was published.

It is with this thought that I propose that comic book critics retire the word “cartoony” and find more descriptive terms that judge the artwork not on its maturity, but, rather on whether the art in fact contributes to the work’s purpose.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Black Bolt #1 (2017)

The Inhumans have always been an interesting set of Marvel Comics characters.  Their creation obviously was a construct of several themes going beyond just muscular-bound men and buxom women “pow-ing” and “zapping” their way through the panels.  Through their adventures, many writers have explored the themes of monarchies, family, social status, genealogy, inheritance, individuality, genetics, and history, just name a few.  I have always had a fondness for the character of Black Bolt, who, by inheritance was king, but, through the Terrigen mist, was essentially mute because the single whispered word  passed through his mouth causes destruction, a symbol of the unforeseen consequences a ruler has when he speaks.  In addition to having to govern over his people, he has to contend with his insane brother, Maximus, who seeks to dethrone Black Bolt and take his place. In recent Marvel history, Black Bolt has suffered under the weight of his throne, such that he was r...
Post a Comment
Read more

Everyone Loves Tank Girl #1

I read Martin and Hewitt’s Tank Girl as a teen in high school.  I was attracted to the rawness of the artwork as well as the bawdiness of the stories.  It was a four issue mini-series as recalled.  Hewitt went on to help develop with that guy from Blur the concept band Gorillaz, which has been successful in its own right.  Unlike most comic book series, the original issues were split into smaller stories, usually with some kind of punchline at the end.  Also infused into the comic was a lot of social satire, poking fun at a society obsessed with celebrity.  Tank Girl has continued on with various different artists filling in with the same general bawdiness and social satire. Everybody Loves Tank Girl carries on in that tradition, a series of bawdy tales ending with a kind of punchline at the end.  While Martin has remained on writing duties, Jim Mahford has taken over artist duty. But comics have changed over the last twenty years.  The art has ch...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fantastic Four (1961-1998) #36, #38 - #43

I am reading a collection published by Marvel regarding the Origins of the Inhumans.  It starts with issues of the Fantastic Four in which they encounter the Frightful Four, a team composed of the Wizard, who sometimes calls himself the Wingless Wizard, the Sandman, Paste-Pot Pete, who also changed in his name to the Trickster, and, the Inhuman, Medusa.  The series of Fantastic Four issues starting with issue # 36 and running in issues # 38 through # 43 are a confusing jumble of ideas and plot written and drawn by the infamous team of Stan Lee and Jack Kirby. The Fantastic Four have been one of the core comics around which Marvel has built their Marvel Universe, its villains and guest superheroes have spun off into a number of series themselves.  Like all comics from the beginning era of Marvel, Lee and Kirby incorporated certain themes into their work which form the basis of how we were to read the comics.  These themes are exposed especially in those issues with th...
Post a Comment
Read more